|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Perkin Warbeck
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
248
   |
Posted - 2017.06.12 07:00:55 -
[1] - Quote
It's carebear tears plain and simple. They've nerfed the Rorq (which was ridiculously overpowered) and now they have nerfed carriers. I'm sure supers will be next. And that's fine because it is retardedly simple to make isk in null. The main issue is that everyone skill injected their alts to get one of these and is now seeing a diminished return.
Yes some Citadel mechanics should be tweaked as the effort/benefit of removing them is out of whack. Aegis sov is far better than what was there was before. But lack of content drivers in null? Please pull the other one. That's what everyone was saying before WWB. Most of the major content in this game has been player driven and not about mechanics at all.
|
Perkin Warbeck
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
249
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 09:47:59 -
[2] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Perkin Warbeck wrote:... But lack of content drivers in null? Please pull the other one. That's what everyone was saying before WWB. Most of the major content in this game has been player driven and not about mechanics at all.
I thought WWB was a combination of the biggest sov mechanics change ever, basically a complete overhaul, and the delivery of a dumptruck load of gambling isk. Witjhout the changes to sov mechanics you could WWB until you were blue in the face and change very little of the map. Entosis sov favours dogpiling and can only be defended by the sov holder. Making carriers into really tanky battleships better be a major fix, because it's a major nerf.
Yet we want to return to pre-Aegis sov when noone could take sov and whoever brought the biggest blob to grind out those structures won. WWB was a culmination of a ton of isk and a large group of players wanting to stick it to the predominant entity in the game. The sov changes in themselves didn't 'trigger' the war. It was the players.
As for entosis sov favouring dogpiling? That's just rubbish. So we've moved the complaints about Aegis sov from ceptors and griffins online with everyone being able to 'troll our sov' to nobody can take it and it favours the defender? Yeah, right, can you maybe try that one again?
And what's wrong with a carrier being really tanky battleship? Lets face it the only time carriers were used before the nerf was for PvE. I'm sure you can point to a few null sec doctrines and that one time you dropped them on a super at band camp but apart from that they are used in havens because, unlike subcaps, they can tank the rat dread when it spawns. That's what the nerf is about and that's why the summer of rage is a farce.
|
Perkin Warbeck
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
250
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 13:06:28 -
[3] - Quote
Chopper Rollins wrote:Perkin Warbeck wrote:The sov changes in themselves didn't 'trigger' the war. It was the players.
As for entosis sov favouring dogpiling? That's just rubbish. So we've moved the complaints about Aegis sov from ceptors and griffins online with everyone being able to 'troll our sov' to nobody can take it and it favours the defender? Yeah, right, can you maybe try that one again?
The complaints you mentioned about Aegis sov i'm not aware of. Entosis sov allows anyone to attack but only the sov holder to defend, is this not true?
Nope. I can kill any nerd trying to entosis anybody's sov. Unlees they are blue. I'm told this is not the done thing.
I can't entosis the node for the sov holder but then why would I want to? If they can't summon the energy to undock an atron with an entosis link then what are your paying them for?
|
Perkin Warbeck
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
250
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 21:12:53 -
[4] - Quote
Admiral Sarah Solette wrote:Perkin Warbeck wrote:Lets face it the only time carriers were used before the nerf was for PvE. I'm sure you can point to a few null sec doctrines and that one time you dropped them on a super at band camp but apart from that they are used in havens because, unlike subcaps, they can tank the rat dread when it spawns. That's what the nerf is about and that's why the summer of rage is a farce. I don't think I've ever seen a player so ignorant of a ship class. Carriers were only used in PvE? Really? Because almost every major battle had carriers and dreads. Carriers are only used because they can tank dreadnaughts? So can rattles and T3Cs. Maybe you should actually do a bit of research before you go spouting off horse **** from your high horse.
Annnd Force Auxillaries were created in what 2015? Welcone back returning player. A lot has changed. Drakes are no longer good. |
Perkin Warbeck
Higher Than Everest
The-Culture
250
|
Posted - 2017.06.13 21:07:49 -
[5] - Quote
A quick and easy fix if they want to nerf PvE income is just have each successive wave of rats warp into the anom (just like the are doing with the current rogue drone event). Slow the warp speed if rats down depending on the size of the anom, so sanctums/havens are slowest. It means that all ticks are reduced but the supposed combat abilities of carriers are maintained. |
|
|
| |
|